SUNDAR LAL @ RAM SUNDAR v. UPZILADHIKARI, TEHSIL MILKIPUR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/5925/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168024 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168024 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5925 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to State-respondent for expeditious disposal of partition suit bearing Case No. 3241/2024, Computerized Case No. T202404230403241 (Sundar Lal Vs. Bhawanipher and others), filed U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Upziladhikari, Tehsil - Milkipur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide partition suit bearing Case No. 3241/2024, Computerized Case No. T202404230403241 (Sundar Lal Vs. Bhawanipher and others), filed U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Sundar Lal @ Ram Sundar .....Petitioner(s) Upziladhikari, Tehsil Milkipur, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 Ravi/RKM A227 No. 5925 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench