Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
CRLR No. 42 of 2022 Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
Ms. Poonam Rauthan, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the revisionist.
2. Mr. J.P.Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State/respondent no.1.
3. Ms. Shankar Agarwal, Advocate for respondent no.2.
4. Learned counsel for the parties submits that a decree of divorce by mutual consent has been passed by the Family Court, and as such the present criminal revision has become infructuous.
5. In view of the above statement, the criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.)
25.07.2025
Nahid