TEJ KRISHAN v. M.A.BUKHARI,SECY.SHEEP HUSBNDRY AND ANR.
CPSW/53/2013 · 2025-02-10
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1680 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1680 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 53/2013 in SWP No. 621/2012
Taj Krishan
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
M. A. Bukhari Secy. Sheep Husbandry and another .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 10.02.2025
1. Compliance report has been filed by the respondents, wherein claim of the petitioner has been rejected.
2. In view of this, contempt proceedings are dropped and the contempt petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as available under law.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 10.02.2025 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
Serial No. 59 Sahil Padha 2025.02.10 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document