Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1680 (GUJ)

KAILASHBHAI FATEHSINGH BAGHEL v. STATE OF GUJARAT

SCR.A/52/2025 · 2025-05-09

Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai, Vaibhavi D Nanavati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/SCR.A/52/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/05/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (HABEAS CORPUS) NO. 52 of 2025 ============================================= KAILASHBHAI FATEHSINGH BAGHEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ============================================= Appearance: MR BHAVIK R SAMANI(8339) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED TO CONCERNED POLICE STATION HOWEVER, SERVICE REPORT NOT FILED BY POLICE STATION for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,5 MS DHWANI R TRIPATHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ============================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI Date : 09/05/2025 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI) 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner herein has prayed for the following reliefs: “8. The petitioner, therefore, most humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to - (A) Admit this Special Criminal Application. (B) Allow this Special Criminal Application by issuing a writ of Habeas Corpus or any appropriate writ or order in that nature directing Respondent No.4 to produce Corpus Respondent No.5 before this Hon’ble court in the interest of justice. (C) Pending admission, hearing and till final disposal of this application, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct Respondent No.4 to find out the Respondent no.5 and produce before this Hon’ble court in the interest of justice. R/SCR.A/52/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/05/2025 (D) Grant such other and further relief(s) in favour of petitioner as may be deemed just and proper by this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard Mr. Bhavik R. Samani, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Dhwani R. Tripathi, learned APP appearing for the respondent – State. 3. The corpus is present through video conference. She has interacted with her parents. The present petition is filed by the father of the corpus, who is also present. The corpus states that she has got married and she desirous to stay with her husband. 4. In view of the aforesaid and the corpus being major and having stated before this Court in presence of respective advocates, no further orders are required to be passed. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J) (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) NEHA Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: NEHA CHANDRESHKUMAR PRAJAPATI(HC01404), STENO GR II, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/05/2025 16:04:33