ASHHAD MEHDI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. (FOREST) GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/11704/2025 · 2025-10-07
Shree Prakash Singh
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11704 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Ramanand Yadav, learned counsel for petitioners, learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider and provide the revised/upgraded/amended pay scale of Rs.5000-8000/- to the petitioners w.e.f. 01.01.1996 along with interest @ 18%, with all consequential service benefits including arrears of the differences of salary etc. pursuant to Govt.
order dated 24.10.2009 and 23.04.2025 issued in compliance of judgment & orders dated 21.08.2008 &03.02.2010 passed in writ petitions bearing no.5902 (S/S) of 2005 and writ petition no.2974 (S/S) of 2007 and judgmernt and order dated 27-08-2025 passed by Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Special appeal (Defective) No. 540 of 2011 and 541 of 2011 respectively, filed by similarly situated employees/incumbents of the state government's department, also in view of recent judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel Vs Union of India- Civil Appeal No.1943 of 2022 decided on 09.12.2024.
ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to re-determine/re-fix pension of the petitioners after providing the revised/upgraded/amended pay scale of Rs. 5000-8000/- to the petitioners w.e.f. 01.01.1996 instead of 06.11.2003.
iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to take decision upon the pending representation of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Arjun Singh Yadav, Rama Nand Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ashhad Mehdi And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. (Forest) Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
the petitioners in light of judgment and order dated 21.8.2008 and 3.2.2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 5902 (S/S) of 2005 and writ petition no. 2974 (S/S) of 2007 respectively."
3. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to submit their fresh individual representation before the opposite party no. 2-Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of U.P., Civil Secretariat, Lucknow or any other competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same expeditiously within a period of eight weeks in the light of judgements indicated in the prayer as the same is applicable.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, petition stands
disposed of.
October 7, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 11704 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench