Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167979 (ALL)

RENU SHARMA v. THE PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL/LABOUR COURT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

A227/5955/2025 · 2025-09-26

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5955 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents Nos. 1 and 3 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case bearing application/complaint under Section 33-A of ID, Act 1947 preferred in ID No. 28 of 2021 dated 26.04.2021 (Renu Sharma v. Axis Bank and Asix Securities Ltd.) pending before the respondent No.1. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case bearing application/complaint under Section 33-A of ID, Act 1947 preferred in ID No. 28 of 2021 dated 26.04.2021 (Renu Sharma v. Axis Bank and Asix Securities Ltd.) most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepti Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shrikant Tripathi Renu Sharma .....Petitioner(s) The Presiding Officer Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Asheesh A227 No. 5955 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench