SUNITA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5950/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5950 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil- Milkipur, District Ayodhya to decide mutation proceedings of case No.7192 of 2022 (Computerized case No.T 202204230407192) "Sunita Yadav and others VS. Anantram Mishra and others", expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil- Milkipur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide mutation proceedings of case No.7192 of 2022 (Computerized case No.T 202204230407192) "Sunita Yadav and others Vs. Anantram Mishra and others", expeditiously, say within a period of three months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Tiwari, Richa Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sunita Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
of. September 26, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5950 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench