MD. RIZWAN ANSARI ALIAS MD. RIJWAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5809/2025 · 2025-07-14
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16796 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16796 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:19109 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5809 of 2025
------ Md. Rizwan Ansari @ Md. Rijwan Ansari, aged about 24 years, son of Nurjan Anari, resident of village-Jhabadatand, P.O.-Khurchutta, P.S.-Bengabad, District-Giridih.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 14-07-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.37 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 96/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 8/12 of the POCSO Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, was involved in procuration of the minor victim girl. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against the co- accused Nijam Ansari. It is next submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner handed over the clothes and other articles to the co-accused and there is no allegation against the petitioner of doing any wrongful act with the victim. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-16 of this bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.03.2025 as is evident from para- 01 of this bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Spl. Judge, POCSO Act, Giridih in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.37 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/