HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9757 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in not renewing his passport. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the respondents, who has made a suggestion that the petitioner may file fresh representation along with all the documents in relation to the cases that were/are pending against him. 4. The suggestion given by learned counsel for the respondents seems to be reasonable. 5. Accordingly, we direct the petitioner to file fresh application within a week as mentioned above and upon such application being received, respondents authorities shall provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a two weeks from the date of receipt of the application. If any reasoned order is passed in favour of the petitioner, the passport of the petitioner should be renewed forthwith. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhu Sharan, Uma Shanker Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. Mohammad Shamim Khan .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secretary Ministry Of External Affairs New Delhi And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the above directions, writ petition is disposed of. October 9, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 9757 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench