RAJU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. (PWD) LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/11630/2025 · 2025-10-09
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167928 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167928 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11630 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. It has been submitted that petitioner was initially appointed on compassionate basis on 15.12.2001 but is not even being paid minimum of the pay-scale.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently incorrect prayers have been made in the petition and therefore seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh.
4. Considering aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting aforesaid liberty. October 9, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Raju .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Public Works Deptt. (Pwd) Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench