Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167923 (ALL)

SHIVAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9362/2025 · 2025-09-26

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9362 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Rahul Roshan Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned AGA for the State. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the First information report bearing FIR No-655/2025, Under Section 420, 323, 342, 395, 386, 506 IPC. at P.S. Purakalendar, District-Ayodhya, lodged by opp. Party no-4, as contained as Annexure no.1 to this writ petition. (ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Party no- 3 not to harass and arrest the petitioner and also not to adopt any coercive manner during the pendency of this writ petition." 3. Learned AGA has produced a copy of instructions letter dated 26.09.2025, same is taken on record. 4. As per the aforesaid instructions, the petitioner is not named in the impugned FIR nor any investigation is pending against him nor he has any apprehension of arrest. 5. In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition, therefore, the present writ petition is consigned to the record. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) September 26, 2025/Reena Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Roshan Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Shivam Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench