Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:17907 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5171 of 2025
------ Ravi Yadav, aged about 33 years, son of Badri Yadav, resident of Village –Makdiha, P.O. –Kubri, P.S. –Dhanwar, District – Giridih (Jharkhand)
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 03.07.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Dhab P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 121(1), 121(2), 132, 303(2), 317(2), 324(5), 324(6) & 62 of the B.N.S., 2023, under Section 21 of the M.M.D.R. Act, under Rule 54 of the J.M.M.C. Rules and under Section 33, 33A & 42(1) of the Indian Forest Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner indulged in quarrying of green stone from the forest area illegally and attacked the police party, attempting to murder the police personnel. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is next submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.05.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 12 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of
this Court vide order dated 05.06.2025 in B.A. No. 4501 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Koderma, in connection with Dhab P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/