RAMPHAL v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION GOVT. NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/11706/2025 · 2025-09-26
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167901 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167901 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11706 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the material available on record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following main relief:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no-3 to make payment of Gratuity amount, Provident Fund (PF) Privilege Leave Encashment admitted amount of Anneuxre No.2 along with interest to the petitioner."
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Additional General Manager (Unit Head) ITI Limited, Raebareli, U.P. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of eight weeks thereafter. The concerned authority shall also consider the aspect of interest on delayed payment.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Nidhi Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ramphal .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communication Govt. New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench