CRM-M-18892- IN THE H (134) ASHISH STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. H MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 528 of Bh seeking quashing Chief Judicial Ma arising out of FI Arms Act at Polic bail of the petition 2. It is a 17.04.2025 was n arrested in anothe Police Station Kun only vide order da -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Anil Kumar Malik, Advocate for Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh shing of the order dated 17.04.2025 p ial Magistrate, Panipat in criminal ca of FIR No.1467 dated 28.09.2023 re t Police Station Sector Panipat City, etitioner had been cancelled and bonds It is argued by learned counsel for the was not intentional but was due to another case bearing FIR No.767 d on Kundli, District Sonepat and he had rder dated 17.07.2025 passed by Coor JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-18892-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 08.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA ate for the petitioner preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) 025 passed by the Court of Learned inal case titled as State Vs. Ashish, 023 registered under Section 25 of City, District Panipat, whereby the bonds were forfeited to the State. or the petitioner that his absence on ue to the reason that he had been 767 dated 01.12.2024 registered at he had been extended benefit of bail Coordinate Bench of this Court. It M) 2026 nder SS”) rned hish, 5 of y the e on been d at f bail rt. It AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.08 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-18892- is submitted that h Trial Court and he 3. Noti 4. Learn and has not contro 15.02.2025 in som 5. This the parties. 6. The C Chief Judicial Ma that fresh warran 04.06.2026. Taki that the petitioner keeping in view th order. The petit surrender before th appearing before t he will be admitted 7. A cop 08.04.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 2 that he is ready and willing to join p and hence it is urged that the petition d Notice of motion. Learned State counsel has accepted controverted the fact that the petition in some other case. This Court has heard the submission The Copy of the latest order dated 02 ial Magistrate, Panipat has also been p warrants of arrest have been issue Taking into consideration the above tioner was in custody in some other ca view the fact that there is no illegality petition is disposed of by giving fore the Trial Court within a period o efore the Trial Court and furnishing fr dmitted to bail by the Trial Court. A copy of this order be sent to the Le (MA Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No join proceedings before the Learned ition deserves to be allowed. epted advance notice of the petition etitioner remained in custody w.e.f. ission made by learned counsel for ted 02.04.2026 as passed by Learned been placed on record which shows issued against the petitioner for above discussed facts which shows ther case as on 17.04.2025, however, egality or infirmity in the impugned iving direction to the petitioner to riod of 20 days from today. On his hing fresh as well as personal bonds, the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE oned:- Yes/No es/No rned tition .e.f. l for rned hows for hows ever, gned er to n his nds, AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.08 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.