Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167893 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. SECONDARY EDU. DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/11680/2025 · 2025-09-26

Pankaj Bhatia

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11680 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents. 2. No notice is required to be issued to respondent No.5 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. 4. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been working as an ad-hoc teacher since long. Subsequent to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.8300 of 2016 In Re Sanjay Singh & Ors vs State of U.P. and Ors dated 26.08.2020 the State Government has issued a Government Order dated 08.07.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-4 to the petition per which such teachers as the petitioner can be considered for being engaged on honorarium basis. The petitioner stakes his claim for benefit of the aforesaid Government Order. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Singh, Ranjit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anil Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.3 then the respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. 7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. September 26, 2025 VNP/- WRIA No. 11680 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench