Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167891 (ALL)

UDAY PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9352/2025 · 2025-10-09

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9352 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1.Heard Sri Kuldeep Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Devendra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2.This petition has been filed with the following prayers:- a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties not to harass the petitioner, in the interest of justice. b.Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no.2 to decide the application dated 16.09.2025 made by the petitioner before opp. party no.2, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice. 3. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions received from Sri Ram Raj Chaudhary, Sub Inspector, Ayodhya, which has been placed before this Court and taken on record, has submitted that the son of the petitioner is accused in Case Crime No.398 of 2015 under Sections 498-A IPC and 4 Dowry Prohibition Act and the petitioner is not being harassed in any manner by the police concerned in connection with the said prosecution. 4. In view of above, the petition is disposed of in terms of statement of learned A.G.A. October 9, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devendra Kumar, Aziza Khan, Sandeep Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Uday Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench