Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16789 (KAR)

SRI MOHAN v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5304/2025 · 2025-06-05

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19053 WP No. 5304 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 5304 OF 2025 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHAN, S/O. DODDARAMAPPA, ARCHAKA S/O LATE VADDAALAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 2. SRI. S. GOPINATH, 2ND ARCHAKA SASALEHALLI, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 3. S. RAMESH S/O RANGAPPA, 3RD ARCHAKA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS THE APPELLANT NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT SAASALAHALLI VILLAGE, TIPATUR TALUK, TUMAKURU - 562 101. 4. RANAGASWAMY, S/O BASAVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, NONAVINAKERE. 5. SRI. J.V. CHANDRSHEKER, S/O VADDALAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19053 WP No. 5304 of 2025 6. SRI. G.V. LINGARAJU, S/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 7. SRI. G.V. GOVINDASWAMY, S/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 8. SRI. B.J. HEMANTHA KUMAR, S/O LATE JAYADEVA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 9. HEMACHALA, S/O NAGARAJU G.S, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, ALL ARE APPELLANTS NO. 5 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT GANGANAGHATTA VILLAGE, TIPTUR TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 562 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, MUZARAI DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMAKUR DISTRICT, TUMAKUR - 572 201. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TUMAKUR DISTRICT, TUMAKUR - 572 201. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19053 WP No. 5304 of 2025 4. SRI. S.V. CHANDRASHEKER, S/O VADDALAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 5. SRI. SEETHARAMA NAIK, S/O CHIKKANAYAK, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 6. SRI. S.M. GANGAHDRAIHA S/O MUDDABASAVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 7. SRI. RANGAYYA, S/O BELURAAIHA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 8. SRI. SHIVARUDRAPPA, S/O PUTTA BASAVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT SAASALAHALLI VILLAGE, TIPTUR, TUMAKURU - 572 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAYANNA GOWDA N.R, ADVOCATE FOR C/R8; SRI. DEVARAJ C.H, GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR AND EXAMINE THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.THE ORDER IN ADM/7/RP/30/2024-25 DATED 16.01.2025 ANNX-A AND ETC., - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19053 WP No. 5304 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as hereunder: "It is submitted that the undersigned advocate for petitioners in the above petition prays that this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit the petitioners to withdraw the above petition as not pressed. Hence this memo." In light of the same, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41 CT: BHK