MOHD. ASLAM THRU. POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SMT. RIJAVANA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/ COLLECTOR, AMETHI AND OTHERS
A227/5933/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167859 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167859 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5933 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the owruruibwewa as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the State while notice on behalf of respondent No.4- Gaon Sabha has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Present petition has been filed to decide Case No.7643/2025, computerized case No.T202504710207643 " Mohd. Aslam Vs. Mohd. Harun and others" under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before respondent No.1 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Musafirkhana, District Amethi, expeditiously. 44 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the case which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage.
6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the court concerned within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the court concerned shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Harikesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Mohd. Aslam Thru. Power Of Attorney Holder, Smt. Rijavana .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate/ Collector, Amethi And Others .....Respondent(s)
shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously.
7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5933 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench