HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5928 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to State-respondent for expeditious disposal of Correction Application No. 32/2024 (Anirudh Bahadur Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Pargana Adhikari, Sadar, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide Correction Application No. 32/2024 (Anirudh Bahadur Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another), expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Dayal, Yasir Rehman Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anuruddh Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) Pargana Adhkiari, Sader, Pratapgarh And Another .....Respondent(s) adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 Ravi/RKM A227 No. 5928 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench