FATEH MUSALMAN @ FATE MOHAMMAD v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/1609/2024 · 2025-09-16
Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16784 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16784 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1609 of 2024 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Sri Mansur Ali Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted against petitioner and cognizance has also been taken by the concerned Magistrate.
3. Upon the charge sheet being submitted and cognizance being taken, petitioner has preferred an application u/s 482 Cr.P.C., which too has been allowed.
4. In view thereof, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be accordingly dismissed.
4. Learned AGA has no objection.
5. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 17, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mansur Ali Ansari, Shams Uz Zaman Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Fateh Musalman @ Fate Mohammad .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad