SUSHEELA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5943/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167839 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167839 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5943 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Bipin Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Faizabad/Ayodhya, to decide recall application dated 10.11.2023 in Mutation Case No. RST/509/2013-2014 (Computerized Case No. T 2013042332325) - Asha and Others Vs. Dhanraji, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Faizabad/Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Faizabad/Ayodhya, is directed to decide recall application dated 10.11.2023 in Mutation Case No. RST/509/2013-2014 (Computerized Case No. T 2013042332325) - Asha and Others Vs. Dhanraji, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
September 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bipin Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Susheela .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench