RADHA KRISHNA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
NABAIL/1425/2025 · 2025-10-07
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167833 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167833 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1425 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.
The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.0207 of 2025 under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(2) and 340(2) BNS, Police Station Rampur Kalan, District Sitapur.
After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided in view of law laid by Supreme Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 " Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another".
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.
In view of the above, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. It is provided that in case a regular bail application is filed within ten days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the same be decided in view of the law laid by by Supreme Court vide order Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar, Kuldeep Kumar, Pankaj Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Radha Krishna .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
dated 7.10.2021 passed in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). October 7, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S NABAIL No. 1425 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench