HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1417 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.511 of 2025 under section 108 BNS, P.S. Kotwali Shahar, district Hardoi.. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused applicant is a lady. She has been falsely implicated. She was married with the deceased 10 years ago. She is living separately. 4. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel and has submitted that five matrimonial disputes were going on between the parties. The allegation against the applicant is evident from the suicide note of the deceased. Offence is punishable upto 10 years. It cannot be said to be a false implication. 5.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, nature of offence, suicide note, complicity of the applicant, this court does not find any ground to interfere in the matter. It does not appear to be a case of false implication. The anticipatory bail is an exceptional jurisdiction (Nikita Jagganath Shetty versus The State of Maharashtra and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anoop Vajpayee, Atul Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aparna Singh @ Parul .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) others Criminal Appeal No.3088 of 2025 (relevant para 18). This court is not inclined to show indulgence in this case. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. It is accordingly rejected. September 26, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1417 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench