Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167817 (ALL)

RADHEYSHYAM @ RADHEYSHYAM GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9353/2025 · 2025-10-09

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9353 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Priyam Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that he does not want to press this petition, therefore, the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. To which, there is no objection by learned A.G.A. 3. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. October 9, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Supriya Tiwari, Priyam Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Radheyshyam @ Radheyshyam Gautam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench