Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167808 (ALL)

RAM KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND ANOTHER

A227/5961/2025 · 2025-09-26

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5961 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Consolidation Officer (Prabhari), Ambedkar Nagar to decide Restoration Application dated 31.05.2023 seeking recall of order dated 06.12.2022, filed in Case No. 421/06.12.2022 - Ram Kumar Vs. State, U/S 9Ka(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Consolidation Officer (Prabhari), Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Consolidation Officer (Prabhari), Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide Restoration Application dated 31.05.2023 seeking recall of order dated 06.12.2022, filed in Case No. 421/06.12.2022 - Ram Kumar Vs. State, U/S 9Ka(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Nishad, Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Ambedkar Nagar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench