ANOOP KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/820/2025 · 2025-09-26
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 820 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. The instant application has been preferred for the following main relief(s):-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that petitioner seek indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for a direction to the Additional Court, Faizabad to decide the Complaint Case Number-80/2023, under section-138 N.I. Act, P.S.-Kotwali Nagar, District- Faizabad/Ayodhya titled "Anoop Kumar Gupta vs. Priyanka Kasaudhan" pending before him, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a stipulated time, in the interest of justice. The true electro state copy of the memo of complaint case along with annexure is being annexed as Annexure no. 1 to this petition."
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also that the complaint case in issue is pending consideration since 2023 before the trial court concerned and as per Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the proceedings instituted under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 shall be concluded expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the case and also taking note of observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case(s) of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another, (1978) 1 SCC 248; Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 81 and Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar, (1981) 3 SCC 671, regarding expeditious disposal of cases, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to consider and decide the complaint case in issue, expeditiously.
4. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nand Kishore Patel Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Anoop Kumar Gupta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench