Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167785 (ALL)

SMT. MEENA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. S.D.M., TAHSIL LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5959/2025 · 2025-09-26

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5959 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while notice on behalf of respondent No.2 has been accepted by Sri Namit Sharma. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Lucknow to decide revenue case No.1808/2025, computerized case No.T202510460201808 under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code (Smt. Meena Vs. Nagar Nigam and others), expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Lucknow is directed to decide revenue case No.1808/2025, computerized case No.T202510460201808 under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code (Smt. Meena Vs. Nagar Nigam and others) expeditiously, say within a period of five months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jyoti Rajpoot, Gayatri Abhyasi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Namit Sharma Smt. Meena .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. S.D.M., Tahsil Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5959 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench