MOHAMMAD SHAHBAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11593/2024 · 2025-04-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167782 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167782 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21135 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11593 of 2024 Applicant :- Mohammad Shahban Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Kailash Nath Mishra,Deo Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Kailash Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Anurag Verma, learned A.G.A.-I
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 591 of 2024, under Sections 64, 127(2), 351(3), B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3/4(2), POCSO Act, Police Station Kotwali Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 25.09.2024 against the applicant stating that the applicant had threatened the informant's daughter aged about 15 years while she was going to her school and he forcibly made her sit on his motorcycle, took her to a hotel and raped her. 4. In the statement of the victim recorded u/s 180 B.N.S.S., she stated that she had talked to Saif Khan through phone on several occasions, he had asked her to come to meet him and had stated that his friend, the applicant, would bring her to him. The applicant took her to the place, but Saif Khan did not come there. When the victim made a phone call, Saif Khan said that he was unwell and he would not come, thereafter, the applicant took her to a room in a hotel and raped her. 5. The medico legal examination report of the victim shows no mark of injury or sign of use of force. The age of the victim has been opined to be between 16 to 17 years as per her radiological examination report. 6. In the statement of the victim recorded u/s 183 B.N.S.S., she reiterated her earlier version. 7. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 18 years, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 8. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith copies of the material collected during investigation as well as a copy of the charge-sheet dated 20.10.2024. 9.
A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant annexing a bail-order of the co-accused Saif Khan, who has been granted bail by means of order dated 26.3.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11730 of 2024, which is taken on record. 10. The learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the bail application. He has submitted that the allegation of commission of rape has been levelled against the applicant, and not against Saif Khan, who has already been granted bail. 11. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that although the victim has alleged commission of rape in a hotel room, the Medico- legal Examination Report mentions no mark of injury of sign of use of force on any part of her body; the applicant is a young- man aged 18 years, having no criminal history and he is in jail since 27.09.2024; investigation already stands concluded and chargesheet has been filed, and the co-accused has already been granted bail, without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the aforesaid crime. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Mohammad Shahban be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 15.4.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench