Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16778 (JHR)

MS REX ENGINEERING CONCERN THROUGH ITS PARTNER ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/2888/2019 · 2025-07-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:20917] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2888 of 2019 ------ M/s Rex Engineering Concern, a Partnership Concern, having its office and Factory situated at Baidyanathpur, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Kunda, District Deoghar- 814 112, through its Partner Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged about 68 years, Son of Late Sitaram Sharma, Resident of Baidyanathpur, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Kunda, District Deoghar- 814 112. … Petitioner Versus 1. State Bank of India, a body corporate constituted under State Bank of India Act, 1955, having its corporate Centre at Madam Cama Road, P.O. Nariman Point, P.S. Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400 021 (Maharastra) through its Chariman-cum- Managing Director. 2. The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Regional Office, P.O. Kutchery, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi- 834 001. 3. The Assistant Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Regional Office, P.O. Kutchery, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi- 834 001. 4. The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Deoghar Branch, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Kunda, District Deoghar. … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No:-09 Dated:-29-07-2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in this Writ Petition, hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/