Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16777 (AP)

K K MARINE SERVICES v. AP MARITIME BOARD

WP/11725/2025 · 2025-05-06

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010224852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11725/2025 Between: K K Marine Services ...PETITIONER AND Ap Maritime Board and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O M R LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri G.L.Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel representing O M R Law Firm, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Subbarao, learned standing counsel for respondents 1 & 2 and Sri V.Ashok Ram, learned counel for 3rd respondent. 2. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not giving necessary clearance / No Objection for movement of the petitioner’s barge RADHE from Kakinada Port to Visakhapatnam Port, in pursuance of the application made by the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Learned Standing Counsel, on oral instructions, would submit that the petitioner’s application was rejected by the 2nd respondent on 23.03.2025, as 2 the petitioner had not annexed the passage plan and weather report. Learned Counsel would also submit that, if the petitioner submits a fresh application, the same will be duly considered by the 2nd respondent. 4. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to file a fresh application by annexing the necessary documents. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application to the 2nd respondent by annexing the necessary documents. Upon making such an application, the learned 2nd respondent shall consider the same strictly as per the Rules. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 07.05.2025 KA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11725/2025 Date: 07.05.2025 KA