IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9498 of 2025 Decided on: 6th June, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ravinder Kumar …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Standing Counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:- “i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing Respondent Corporation to regularize services of the petitioner from his initial date of appointment and treat petitioner as appointee on regular appointee with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 ii) That or in alternative, the respondent corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners immediately after one year, by modifying regularization order Annexure P-1, with all consequential benefits in view of judgment by this Hon’ble Court in case CWPOA No.2343 of 2020 titled as Vikram Singh versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation.” 3. Learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner have already been adjudicated in Vikram Singh Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation2. Learned vice counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. 2 CWPOA No.2343 of 2020, decided alongwith connected matters on 09.11.2023. 3 The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 06, 2025 Judge Mukesh