HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5899 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Interim Relief Application filed in Revision No.2523 of 2025, (Computerized Case No.C202504000002523), "Hridyesh Kumar Tripathi and others vs. Sarla Tripathi & others", under Section 219 U.P.L.R. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid Interim Relief Application in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Interim Relief Application filed in Revision No.2523 of 2025, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Hridyesh Kumar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) (Computerized Case No.C202504000002523), "Hridyesh Kumar Tripathi and others vs. Sarla Tripathi & others", under Section 219 U.P.L.R. Act, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 KR A227 No. 5899 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench