Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11089-DB WA No. 224 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT APPEAL NO. 224 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. KAPIL S/O MAHENDER SINGH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT NO.120/695/SY.NO.10/4 TALAGHATTAPURA VILLAGE SARASWATHI NAGAR JYOTHI LAYOUT, BBMP WARD NO.198 UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 062. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. P.MAHESHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, NO.02, N.R.SQUARE BENGALURU - 560 002.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE COMMISSIONER BBMP BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR KENGERI, INDIRA CANTEEN 1ST MAIN ROAD, (VARTHUR ROAD) KENGERI UPANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 060.
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11089-DB WA No. 224 of 2025
3.
ZONAL COMMISSIONER BBMP, SOUTH ZONE RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 098.
4.
MR. HALESH K.
S/O LATE KALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
5.
MR. BHAGYA B.K.
W/O HALESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
RESPONDENT NOs.4 & 5 ARE R/AT NO.4, KEB ROAD KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD THALAGATTAPUR VILLAGE BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 109. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BHARATH B.YADAV, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. H.M.MURALIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORD AND QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE VIDE W.P.NO.20054/2024 DATED
13.01.2025.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11089-DB WA No. 224 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. P. Mahesh for the appellant-original respondent No.4, in course of the submissions stated that the appellant would opt to approach learned Single Judge for appropriate orders for clarification etc. with regard to his case that the appeal is preferred before the competent authority under Section 356 of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020.
Without expressing any opinion and without going into the merits of any of the aspects of matter, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty reserved as above.
SD/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34