HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8377 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the applicant to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every five cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all the three cases. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in five cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- A. Case Crime No. 13/2023, Under Section- 394, 411 1.Р.С. Police Station Kothi, District Barabanki. B. Case Crime No. 148/2023, Under Section 457, 392, 411 I.P.C. Police Station- Tandiawan, District- Hardoi. C. Case Crime No. 151/2023, Section-323,386,452,506 1.P.C. Police Station- Tandiawan, District Hardoi. D. Case Crime No. 693/2023, Section-2/3 of the U.P.Gangster Act, Police Station- Tandiawan, District Hardoi. E. Case Crime No.169/2023, Section-394 & 411 1.P.C. Police Station- Tandiawan, District Hardoi. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Firoz @ Mathu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) aforesaid matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioners to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. September 26, 2025 AKS A482 No. 8377 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench