Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9511 of 2024 Petitioner :- Abdullah Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Revenue, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Pathak,Gaurav Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent State and Shri Mohd. Raziullah, Advocate learned counsel appearing for respondent no.5 only. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Mohd. Raziullah is taken on record. The order under challenge has been passed in mutation proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued, however could not dispute the fact that the petitioner has a statutory remedy in terms of a revision. In view of the availability of statutory remedy, this court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage leaving it open for the petitioner to assail the order before the appropriate statutory forum. It is made clear that the court has not examined the case or has declined to entertain the petition while considering the merits and the court concerned before whom the statutory revision is preferred, the same shall be considered and decided on its own merits. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in the aforesaid terms. OfÏce is directed to return the certified copies of the Annexures/documents to the learned counsel for the petitioner, after obtaining/retaining the photocopies of the same on record. Order Date :- 31.1.2025/Shukla Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench