Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167699 (ALL)

SAURABH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE AND 9 OTHERS

WPIL/1024/2025 · 2025-09-26

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1024 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the material available on record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "(I) To issue a writ, order or direction in the Nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party No.2 to 4 to take action against the private respondents and remove their encroachment over the Gaon Sabha land gata No. 199/0.1260 hect. situated at village Kaymaspur, Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur recorded as Banjar land in the revenue record and to restore the nature of land as was existing prior to encroachment of the private respondents." 3. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon instructions, states that the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P Revenue Code have been initiated and are pending. 4. In view of the said statement, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the authority concerned to decide the pending cases with all expedition within the time, as prescribed in the statute i.e. 90 days, in accordance with law. September 26, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Srijan Raj Singh, Anand Singh Pawar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Saurabh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench