ZUBER AHMAD AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8402/2025 · 2025-09-26
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167698 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167698 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8402 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Sri Manish Singh Chauhan, advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Manish Singh Chauhan, counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 3. Instant application has been filed with prayer to quash the impugned Charge sheet and proceeding of Impugned Charge Sheet No. 02 of 2025 dated 23.07.2025 arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0269 of 2024 Under Section-147, 148, 323, 506, 427, 308, 325, 504, 336, 34 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station -Chinhat, District- Lucknow against the petitioner and to quash/set aside the entire criminal proceedings of Crl. Case no. 30089 of 2025 and the impugned chargesheet and the summoning order dated 07.08.2025 also. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : D.P. Dutt Tiwari, Anil Kumar Singh, Mayank Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Zuber Ahmad And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 7. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8.
Further, the applicants will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the legal and factual pleas which may be available to them, in accordance with law. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. 9. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 26, 2025 Mayank A482 No. 8402 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench