RAMPADARATH MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO
BAIL/12029/2024 · 2025-08-07
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167676 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167676 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46211 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12029 of 2024 Applicant :- Rampadarath Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Kumar Yadav,Bhagwandeen Sharma,Mohammad Ashraf,Sandip Kumar Yadav,Shri Kant Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Mohammad Ashraf, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.73 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 109, 118(1) B.N.S, registered at Police Station Haliyapur, District Sultanpur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 18.07.2024, stating that the informant's daughter had married the applicant about two years ago out of mutual love and affection but after some time, the applicant started ill treating her and he had assaulted her with an axe. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant disclosing his involvement in other criminal history, in which he has not been summoned till date. 6. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith copies of material collected during investigation and a copy of the charge sheet. 7. A second supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant annexing therewith copies of statements of the informant and the victim recorded by a trial court and both of them have been declared to be hostile. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10.
Let the applicant- Rampadarath Maurya be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench