Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167663 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD ARIF @ TILLU AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

A482/8583/2025 · 2025-10-09

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8583 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Mohan Lal Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 3 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 03.11.2023, summoning order dated 15.11.2023 as well as bailabale warrant issued by Special Judge POCSO Act, Lucknow in S.T. No. 3780 of 2023 arising out of F.I.R. No. 213 of 2023, under Sections 354, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 7, 8 POCSO Act, P.S. Babu Banarsi Das, District Lucknow and its entire proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them dated 18.09.2025 (Original copy of the same is appended as Annexure No. 5 to the application). 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Anzar Husain, Faisal Husain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Arif @ Tillu And Another .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) in presence of the parties concerned before the court below itself. 6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of with direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notice to all its signatories requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of two weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicants. 8. Registry is directed to hand over the original copy of the compromise to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining photocopy of the same. October 9, 2025 VKS A482 No. 8583 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench