RAJENDRA PRASAD TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HIGHER EDUCATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/11614/2025 · 2025-09-26
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167661 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167661 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11614 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents as well as Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava who appears for the respondent no. 2 & 3.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer :
"issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the salary to the petitioner for Class IV post (peon) as per the 6th and 7th Pay Commission alongwith arrears and 24% compound interest for the delayed payment. "
3. It is argued that the similarly placed persons are getting the benefits.
4. Without going into the merits of the claim, the present petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 who shall consider the case of the petitioner and shall decide the same within a period of two weeks from the same being filed. September 26, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Rajendra Prasad Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench