APHC010225152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11683 OF 2025 Between: 1. S. Sivanna, S/o. Revanna. Aged about 60 years, Occ: Lecturer of Commerce In Government Degree College, R/o. Madakasira, Srisatya Sai District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. V. Jagannatham, S/o. Late Venkatappa, Aged about 60 years, Occ: in Government Degree College, R/o. Madakasira, Srisatya Sai District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Metia Chinna Obaiah, S/o. Metia Anand, Aged about 60 years, Occ: in Government Degree College, R/o. Bhukapatnam, Srisatya Sai District, Andhra Pradesh. Lecturer of Economics Lecturer of Political Science ...Petitioners AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The Commissioner, Intermediate Education, Tadepalli, Guntur District 3. The Regional Joint, Director of Intermediate Education Prakasam District 4. The Principal, Government Degree College, Madakasira, Srisatya Sai District, Andhra Pradesh 1. to Ongole, 5. The Principal, Government Degree College, Bhukapatnam, Srisatya Sai District Andhra Pradesh. % ...Respondents % ' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue any Writ, order may be or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not extending the age of Superannuation of the Petitioners from 60 years to 62 is wholly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional. years high handed, discrimination and contrary to the spirit and intendment of GOMs.No.15 Finance HRIV FR & LR Department dated 31.01.2022 issued by the 1 Respondent besides violative of Article 14 St 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to extend the age of the superannuation of the Petitioners from 60 GOMs.No.15 Finance HRIV FR & LR Department dated 31.01.2022. years to 62 years as per lA NO: 1 OF 20?.*; Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to extend the age of the superannuation of the Petitioners from 60 years to 62 FR & LR Department dated 31.01.2022 praying that in the circumstances stated years as per GOMs.No.15 Finance HRIV pending Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI AMAGOTH RAGHAVENDRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following order: NAIK II APHC010225152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11683/2025 Between: 1.S SIVANNA, S/O REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC IN GOVERNMENT DEGREE R/0 MADAKASIRA, SRISATYA SAI DISTRICT, LECTURER OF COMMERCE COLLEGE, ANDHRA PRADESH 2.V. JAGANNATHAM, S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC LECTURER OF ECONOMICS IN GOVERNMENT DEGREE COLLEGE, R/0 MADAKASIRA, DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3.METLA CHINNA OBAIAH, S/O METLA ANAND, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC LECTURER OF POLITICAL SCIENCE GOVERNMENT DEGREE COLLEGE, R/O BHUKAPATNAM, SRISATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH SRISATYA SAI IN ...PETITIONER{S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER, INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT, DIRECTOR OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT DEGREE COLLEGE, MADAKASIRA, SRISATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2 5.THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT DEGREE BHUKAPATNAM, SRISATYA SAI DISTRICT PRADESH. COLLEGE, ANDHRA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not extending the age of Superannuation of the Petitioners from 60 years to 62 years is wholly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, high handed, discrimination and contrary to the spirit and intendment of GOMs.No.15 Finance HRIV FR AND LR Department dated 31.01.2022 issued by the 1st Respondent besides violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to extend the age of the superannuation of the Petitioners from 60 years to 62 years as per GOMs.No.15 Finance HRIV FR AND LR Department dated 31.01.2022 and pass any lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondents to extend the age of the superannuation of the Petitioners from 60 years to 62 yearsas per GOMs.No.15 Finance HRIV FR AND LR Department dated 31.01.2022, pending Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.AMAGOTH RAGHAVENDRA NAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: mp 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU N1MMAGADDA WRIT PETITION N0.11683 of 2025 ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for further adjudication by this Court. 1. of the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioners, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 2. In view 3. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand dismissed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS //TRUE COPY// assistant SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Sri Amagoth Raghavendra Naik, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Services II, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:22/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 11683 OF 2025 5^' 'BS£p B02S "VX 5f o DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS