Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167649 (MAD)

Esakki A v. The District Revenue Officer

WP(MD)/29405/2025 · 2025-10-17

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.10.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.29405 of 2025 A.Esakki ...Petitioner Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer , District Revenue Office, Tirunelveli District. 2. Seetha Lakshmi 3. Alwar 4. Jeyalakshmi 5. Perumal ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent DRO, Tirunelveli District to dispose the revision petition pending before him filed by the petitioner against the dismissal order passed by the RDO, Cheranmahadevi dated 14.05.2025 made his proceedings in NEE.MU.C.PA.No./10(706)/2025/AA3 regarding the patta transfer made in favour of 5th respondent in patta Nos.2585 to 2611 on the basis of the fabricated documents, executed by 3rd respondent in favour of 5th Respondent by suppressing the other legal heirs of late Sivanu konar and to incorporate all the legal heirs of sivanu konar including the name of petitioner and other legal 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis heirs of his pre deceased mother namely, Chellam for all the proporties of late Sivanu Konar stood in the old patta No.283 situated at A.Sathankulam Village, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District and to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.09.2025 sent to the DRO, Tirunelveli/the 1st respondent herein through registered post with acknowledgment card within the stipulated time that may be stipulated by this court. For Petitioner : M/s.K.Abiya For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman Government Advocate for R1 ORDER After filing a revision petition before the District Revenue Officer on 02.09.2025 against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, the petitioner seeks early disposal of such revision petition. 2.Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the first respondent. He submits that the revision petition would be disposed of on merits within four months, considering the fact that such revision petition was filed only in September 2025. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3.In view of the nature of relief claimed and the submissions of learned Government Advocate, it is not necessary to issue notice to the private respondents in this writ petition. Instead, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to consider and dispose of the revision petition on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and the private respondents herein. A speaking order shall be issued within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 17.10.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR To The District Revenue Officer , District Revenue Office, Tirunelveli District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY , J. RJR W.P.(MD)No.29405 of 2025 17.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis