Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167644 (ALL)

NARENDRA KUMAR (S.I. PNO-960771170) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/11605/2025 · 2025-10-07

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11605 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed seeking mandamus directing the respondent no.1, i.e., Principal Secretary Home, U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow to consider and decide the representation dated 1.9.2025 of the petitioner under Rule 2025 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed on the post of constable in the year 1996, and subsequently, the Superintendent of Police, Ghaziabad issued show cause notice whereafter the explanation was filed and vide order dated 21st of September 2022, the impugned punishment order of censure entry was passed and thereafter, departmental appeal and revision were filed and those were rejected and against the revisional order ,representation is moved under rule 25 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 1991, before the respondent no.1 on 1st of September 2025, which is pending consideration. She submits that the interest of Justice should be sub-served if the respondent no.1 is directed to consider and decide the statutory representation dated 1st of September 2025, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Nasir, Mohd. Yasir, Navneet Yadav, Rashida Fatima Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Narendra Kumar (S.I. Pno-960771170) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and looking into the statutory representation available to the petitioner and the same is filed before the respondent no.1, the respondent no.1 is hereby directed to consider and decide the said representation dated 1st of September 2025, within a period of two months from the date of a certified copy of this order is produced before him. It is clarified that this court has not dealt with this matter on merits. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. October 7, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 11605 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench