Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167630 (ALL)

AZIZUDDIN AND 14 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. NAGAR VIKAS LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/9652/2025 · 2025-09-26

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9652 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of the State-opposite parties no.1 and 2 and Ms. Pallavi Singh holding brief of Sri Ram Kumar Singh, who appears on behalf of opposite parties no.3 and 4. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "i) issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned demand notices dated 31.7.2023 and 16.11.2023isused by the opp. Party no.3 contained in Annexure Nos.1 to 13 to the writ petition. ii. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the opp. parties to issue fresh demand notices after enhancing 25% rent of the shops after every five years as has been done in the cases of allottees of shops of opposite party no.3 of 2016 for depositing the rent by the petitioners forthwith.” 3. The petitioners are aggrieved by the difference in rent charged from them and from other shop keepers, who are similarly situated. The petitioners have submitted a representation on 22.08.2025, copy of which has been has been filed as Annexure-19 to the writ petition. 4. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Bangarmau, District Unnao to decide the representation of the petitioners by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooqahmad, Dinesh Kumar, Kshitij Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Kumar Singh Azizuddin And 14 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) produced before him. It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated upon the merit of the claim of the petitioners. September 26, 2025 Rao/- WRIC No. 9652 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench