Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167609 (ALL)

SATYAM PANDEY @ YUG PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/9449/2025 · 2025-09-26

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9449 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Angad Kumar Vishwakarma, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.195/2024, under Sections 310(2) B.N.S, registered at Police Station- Manikpur, District- Pratapgarh. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 22.09.2024 against the drivers of two motor-cycles, namely, Rahul Singh , Ratyam Pandey and another person, namely Subham Singh @ Sibbu Singh and four unnamed persons riding from the motor cycles stating that the accused persons had robbed the complainant and his friend. They took Rs.90,000/- and mobile phone from them and ran away with the car of the complainant. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent person, he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in one other case has been disclosed in the affidavit, in the aforesaid case, he has been granted bail. 5. Three co-accused, namely, Kaif Ahmad, Rahul Singh and Subham Singh @ Sibbu Singh have been granted bail by the Coordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 05.02.2025, 11.07.2025 and 08.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.1119/2025, 6430/2025 and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Tiwari, Ambuj Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satyam Pandey @ Yug Pandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 3959/2025 respectively. 6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that three co-accused persons have already been granted bail in this case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Satyam Pandey @ Yug Pandey be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 26, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9449 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench