BANERJEE PANDITA AND ANR. v. SARITA CHOUHAN AND ANR.
CPSW/64/2014 · 2025-04-08
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1676 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1676 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 44 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: CPSW No. 64/2014
Banerjee Pandita and anr. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. P N Bhat, Advocate.
V/s
Sarita Chouhan and anr. …. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 08.04.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instructions to withdraw the instant contempt petition as the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed with a liberty to agitate the matter if the cause survives. His statement is taken on record. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present contempt petition is closed and the proceedings are dropped. Contempt notices shall stand discharged.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE Jammu 08.04.2025 SUNITA/PS