Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16759 (BOM)

SATISH SHIVSHANRANAPPA PANDHARE AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, DIST. LATUR AND ANR

CA/4572/2024 · 2025-08-01

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ca4572-24.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4572 OF 2024 IN X-OBJETION NO. 67 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1369 OF 2015 Satish Shivshanranappa Pandhare & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. H. B. Nandgavale h/f Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for Applicant Mrs. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent - State ....... [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. J.] DATE : 1 st AUGUST, 2025 ORDER : 1. Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “B” and “C”. 3. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/ca4572-24.doc 2025:BHC-AUG:20550-DB