NALLI SANDHY RAANI v. AP STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
WP/11132/2025 · 2025-06-17
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16758 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16758 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010224032025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11132/2025 Between:
1. NALLI SANDHY RAANI, W/O NALLI NARESH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, MPTC CHINCHINDA R/O 4-161, VIPPARTHI VAARI STREET, CHINCHINDA, YALAMANCHILI MANDAJ, WEST GODAVARI
...PETITIONER AND
1. AP STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER FIRST FLOOR NEW HOD BUILDINGS M.G.ROAD VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY ITS PRL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT SECRATRIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT ELECTION AUTHORITY, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM.
4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD, WEST GODAVARI, ELURU.
5. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, MANDAL PARISHAD ELAMANCHILI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DWARAMPUDI SAVITHRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra
3. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms.Savithri Dwarampudi, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri Vivek Chandrasekhar, Ld. Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1, Sri T.Sanjeeva Rao, Ld. Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri P.Chaitanya Srinivas, Ld. Counsel appearing Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, Ld. Standing Counsel for ZPP, MPP, GPP.
2. Sri P.Chaitanya Srinivas, Ld. Counsel representing Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, Ld. Standing Counsel for ZPP, MPP, and GPP, submits that the Election has been conducted and the needful has been done. Ms.Savithri Dwarampudi, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, submits that the needful has been done and that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 18.06.2025 S D P
3
146
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No. 11132 OF 2025
18.06.2025
S D P