IMTIYAJ RASUL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR BARABANKI AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9610/2025 · 2025-09-26
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167579 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167579 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9610 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the material available on record.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that against an order assessing the deficiency, the petitioner has preferred an appeal and has also been filed a stay application, however, the recovery has been issued even when the said application is pending consideration.
3. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of directing the appellate authority to pass order on the appeal preferred by the petitioner, within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
4. Till the passing of the orders, as directed above, the recovery issued against the petitioner shall not be affected. September 26, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivendra Singh Suryavans, Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Imtiyaj Rasul .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Barabanki And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench