Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16756 (KAR)

C.M. SIDDALINGAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

MFA/2689/2019 · 2025-07-10

Ramachandra D Huddar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25156 MFA No. 2689 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2689 OF 2019 (LAC) BETWEEN: C.M. SIDDALINGAPPA S/O C.R. MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O CHANNAPATNA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK & DISTRICT-573 201 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HASSAN SUB-DIVISION HASSAN-573 201 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.W.D. HASSAN DIVISION HASSAN-573 201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI S, HCGP) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.11.2017 PASSED IN LAC NO.35/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Digitally signed by ANJALI M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25156 MFA No. 2689 of 2019 HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL JUDGMENT Heard both the counsels. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that, in the similar connected Miscellaneous First Appeals arising out of the same Notification of Acquisition, the Division Bench of this Court in MFA.No.2497/2019 clubbed with MFA.No.2527/2019 and 2621/2019 passed an order on 21.04.2025 remanding the said appeals to the Reference Court for fresh consideration as per law. 3. As the similarly connected Miscellaneous First Appeals are remanded to the Reference Court for fresh consideration as per law, as this appeal also arises under the same Notification, in view of the judgment of the Division - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25156 MFA No. 2689 of 2019 Bench of this Court dated 21.04.2025 passed in the aforesaid MFA's, this appeal is allowed. 4. This appeal is remitted back to the Reference Court for fresh consideration as per law. As ordered by the Division Bench of this Court, the learned Reference Court is directed to expedite the matter and conclude the proceedings within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. All the contentions are left open. 6. The Court fee paid by the appellant shall be refunded to him digitally. Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE AM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19